Part 4 – DNS server setup for clients
Setup basic DNS server on Linux
So I will eventually have to setup a DNS server on the Wireguard server, but just a simple one. No need to use bind
, but simply DNSmasq
.
Install DNSmasq
$ sudo apt install dnsmasq
Unpacking dnsmasq-base (2.85-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package dnsmasq.
Preparing to unpack .../dnsmasq_2.85-1_all.deb ...
Unpacking dnsmasq (2.85-1) ...
Setting up dnsmasq-base (2.85-1) ...
Setting up dns-root-data (2021011101) ...
Setting up dnsmasq (2.85-1) ...
Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/dnsmasq.service → /lib/systemd/system/dnsmasq.service.
Job for dnsmasq.service failed because the control process exited with error code.
See "systemctl status dnsmasq.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details.
invoke-rc.d: initscript dnsmasq, action "start" failed.
● dnsmasq.service - dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP and caching DNS server
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/dnsmasq.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mon 2021-09-20 00:43:35 CEST; 18ms ago
Process: 23908 ExecStartPre=/etc/init.d/dnsmasq checkconfig (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Process: 23915 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/dnsmasq systemd-exec (code=exited, status=2)
CPU: 55ms
Sep 20 00:43:35 hostname systemd[1]: Starting dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP and caching DNS server...
Sep 20 00:43:35 hostname dnsmasq[23915]: dnsmasq: failed to create listening socket for port 53: Address already in use
Sep 20 00:43:35 hostname dnsmasq[23915]: failed to create listening socket for port 53: Address already in use
Sep 20 00:43:35 hostname systemd[1]: dnsmasq.service: Control process exited, code=exited, status=2/INVALIDARGUMENT
Sep 20 00:43:35 hostname dnsmasq[23915]: FAILED to start up
Sep 20 00:43:35 hostname systemd[1]: dnsmasq.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Sep 20 00:43:35 hostname systemd[1]: Failed to start dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP and caching DNS server.
Processing triggers for dbus (1.12.20-2) ...
Run DNSmasq at startup:
$ sudo systemctl enable dnsmasq
The problem is that DNSmasq tries to bind to port 53
, which on my system is already occupied by systemd-resolved
. I need to figure out how to make these two work together or disable systemd-resolved.
Heads up – Skip to Final configuration for server to see the final configuration files. The following is mostly me trying to figure out how to do this properly. If you enjoy reading about others suffering, go ahead.
Edit /etc/systemd/resolved.conf
DNS configuration is usually managed by /etc/resolv.conf
file, however, if you open the file, it states the following – # This file is managed by man:systemd-resolved(8). Do not edit.
Therefore use /etc/systemd/resolved.conf
to perform any configuration regarding DNS. We are interested mainly in the DNSStubListener
line, which we have to uncomment and set to no
. That disables systemd-resolved from binding to 127.0.0.53:53
. I would also advise to disable LLMNR
and MulticastDNS
, do some research about these two yourself to figure if you need them. The file should now look like this:
[Resolve]
DNS=your_DNS_server
#FallbackDNS=
#Domains=
LLMNR=no
MulticastDNS=no
#DNSSEC=allow-downgrade
#DNSOverTLS=no
#Cache=yes
DNSStubListener=no
#ReadEtcHosts=yes
Restart systemd-resolved. Be aware that you might lose DNS connectivity until you start DNSmasq. I won't do that right now, because I still need to change a few things:
$ sudo systemctl restart systemd-resolved
Running systemd-resolve
to check it's status reveals that some settings aren't still how I wanted. I have managed to change the Global configuration, but not settings for individual interfaces.
$ sudo systemd-resolve --status
Global
Protocols: -LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
resolv.conf mode: uplink
DNS Servers: my_prefered_DNS_server
Link 15 (wg0)
Current Scopes: none
Protocols: -DefaultRoute +LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
Link 19 (eth0)
Current Scopes: DNS
Protocols: +DefaultRoute +LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
DNS Servers: DNS_server_i_dont_like
I haven't find another config file to add these values into, so just change them using the systemd-resolve
command.
$ sudo systemd-resolve --interface eth0 --set-dns my_prefered_DNS_server
$ sudo systemd-resolve --interface eth0 --set-llmnr no
$ sudo systemd-resolve --interface wg0 --set-llmnr no
Again, confirm that everything is set to your liking with systemd-resolve --status
$ systemd-resolve --status
Global
Protocols: -LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
resolv.conf mode: uplink
Current DNS Server: my_prefered_DNS_server
DNS Servers: my_prefered_DNS_server
Link 15 (wg0)
Current Scopes: none
Protocols: -DefaultRoute -LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
Link 19 (eth0)
Current Scopes: DNS
Protocols: +DefaultRoute -LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
Current DNS Server: my_prefered_DNS_server
DNS Servers: my_prefered_DNS_server
Edit /etc/dnsmasq.d
By default, the file is full of commented out lines with all kinds of configuration settings. In fact, it's so long that it's better to back it up and write just the options you want into an empty one.
$ sudo cp /etc/dnsmasq.conf /etc/dnsmasq.conf.default
Delete everything in /etc/dnsmasq.conf
with vi
and 1000dd
.
$ sudo vi /etc/dnsmasq.conf
Add the following lines to the config:
interface=lo,wg0
bind-interfaces
Restart DNSmasq and check if it binded to the right interfaces (localhost and Wireguard)
$ sudo systemctl restart dnsmasq
$ sudo netstat -tulpn | grep 53
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 25764/dnsmasq
tcp 0 0 10.20.20.1:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 25764/dnsmasq
udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:53 0.0.0.0:* 25764/dnsmasq
udp 0 0 10.20.20.1:53 0.0.0.0:* 25764/dnsmasq
All looks great, however, trying multiple pings to common websites reveal random DNS issues:
$ ping google.com
ping: google.com: Temporary failure in name resolution
At this point, I have spent a few hours researching how name resolution works on Linux machines. It got a little more complicated with systemd-resolved. I won't explain the whole proccess or what I did, just show you the final configuration files and try to explain how the name resolution works as of now.
Previous plan
I'm currently trying to figure out how to get DNS resolution working on the server itself (so that the server can resolve names with DNSmasq
and systemd-resolved
combined). My previous plan was:
- Disable
systemd-resolved
binding to127.0.0.53
withDNSStubListener=no
in/etc/systemd/resolved.conf
- Set DNS on all interfaces with systemd-resolved to
127.0.0.1
(this also changes nameserver in/etc/resolv.conf
to127.0.0.1
) - Run DNSmasq on
127.0.0.1
(for the server itelf) and on10.20.20.1
(for the Android Wireguard client). - Set DNS server in DNSmasq (
/etc/dnsmasq.conf
) to a public DNS of choice for regular name resolution.
Thanks to this, when the server wants to perform a DNS query, this happens (as far as I understand, don't @ me and kindly let me know if I'm wrong):
- It first looks into
/etc/nsswitch.conf
and looks onto thehosts
line, which saysfiles dns
. - Because of
files
, it looks into/etc/hosts
first, to see if the address isn't hard-coded this way. - Then because of
dns
, it looks into/etc/resolv.conf
, which is managed by systemd-resolved. This file will only contain127.0.0.1
, which points to DNSmasq running on that interface on port53
. The reason why it points to127.0.0.1
is because we have set DNS to127.0.0.1
globally in/etc/systemd/resolved.conf
. - DNSmasq will take that query and forward it to our prefered public DNS server configured in
/etc/dnsmasq.conf
with theserver
line.
Unfortunately, this does not work, or at least I was unable to make it work this way. The outcome of this is a broken name resolution that sometimes works and sometimes doesn't.
Current plan
To fix my server's DNS resolution, I came up with a reversed setup plan. Instead of everything pointing to DNSmasq for name resolution, I will point DNSmasq to the other side, which is systemd-resolved – this turned out to produce the same behavior.
After thorough examination, I decided to completely throw systemd-resolved out the window by stopping the service and disabling it.
$ sudo systemctl stop systemd-resolved
$ sudo systemctl disable systemd-resolved
Try the good old way of editing /etc/resolv.conf
and add your DNS server. After adding different upstream DNS servers, I'm slowly starting to realize that the entire issue might have been actually caused by the upstream server and not my local configuration. The DNS I used before is extremely fast (+-2 ms response times), but sometimes just stops responding completely. It might have something to do with reverse lookup and I might somehow fix it later, but for now, I have decided to opt for the slower, but more reliable upstream DNS server.
Final configuration for server
There might actually be a way to do it! Go back to my reversed setup plan, because this time it works.
Enable and start systemd-resolved again:
$ sudo systemctl enable systemd-resolved
$ sudo sytemctl start systemd-resolved
Look into /etc/resolv.conf
. Because we have started systemd-resolved, it had already probably overwrote /etc/resolv.conf
with the following, which is alright:
nameserver 127.0.0.53
options edns0 trust-ad
search .
Open /etc/systemd/resolve.conf
and make it look like this:
[Resolve]
DNS=my_prefered_DNS_server
FallbackDNS=secondary_DNS_server
#Domains=
LLMNR=no
MulticastDNS=no
#DNSSEC=allow-downgrade
#DNSOverTLS=no
#Cache=yes
DNSStubListener=yes
#ReadEtcHosts=yes
Check status of systemd-resolve and edit DNS server for eth0
if it still has a wrong value
$ systemd-resolve --status
Global
Protocols: -LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
resolv.conf mode: stub
Current DNS Server: my_prefered_DNS_server
DNS Servers: my_prefered_DNS_server
Fallback DNS Servers: secondary_DNS_server
Link 15 (wg0)
Current Scopes: none
Protocols: -DefaultRoute -LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
Link 19 (eth0)
Current Scopes: DNS
Protocols: +DefaultRoute -LLMNR -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
Current DNS Server: my_prefered_DNS_server
DNS Servers: my_prefered_DNS_server
Your /etc/dnsmasq.conf
should look like this. We want to run DNSmasq only on the Wireguard interface, but interface also automatically adds loopback to the list. Use except-interface
to disable binding to localhost.
interface=wg0
except-interface=lo
bind-interfaces
server=127.0.0.53
Start DNSmasq
# sudo systemctl start dnsmasq
You can tell by the output of systemctl status dnsmasq
, that it's using 127.0.0.53
as it's DNS server.
...
using nameserver 127.0.0.53#53
reading /etc/resolv.conf
...
Recap what we know about name resolution on the server now. When the server makes a DNS query, this happens (probably):
- Debian consults
/etc/nsswitch.conf
, reads/etc/hosts
due tofiles
option specified at thehosts:
line, then goes for the DNS server. - DNS server in
/etc/resolv.conf
points to127.0.0.53
, which issystemd-resolv DNSStubListener
. systemd-resolved
is set up to use a prefered public DNS server.
Now onto the main reason why I did this whole thing. Provide a simple DNS server for my Android client.
Setup DNS for client name resolution
Edit /etc/hosts
Add the websites you want to resolve to /etc/hosts
. That way, when clients queries DNSmasq listening on 10.20.20.1
, it forwards the query to 127.0.0.53
, which also reads /etc/hosts
, resolving the IP correctly.
10.20.20.1 mysite.com
10.20.20.1 mysite2.com
Add DNS to Android config
Edit the config by adding 10.20.20.1
to DNS servers
.
Adjust Firewall for testing
In order for the Android device to be able to use the DNS server on 10.20.20.1
, I need to adjust iptables
to allow traffic on port 53 on the Wireguard interface. Add this to your iptables configuration file and apply with iptables-restore
.
# Allow DNS queries on the Wireguard interface
-A INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -i wg0 -j ACCEPT
$ sudo iptables-restore /etc/iptables/rules.v4
Now access your websites from the Android client and it should resolve correctly to the server's Wireguard IP.
The only "problem" right now is that the Android client will most likely use the Wireguard server IP 10.20.20.1
for all name resolution while it's connected to the VPN. This is not a huge deal since the queries are pretty fast, but might be a deal breaker for some.
No Comments